In group theory, more precisely in geometric group theory, a hyperbolic group, also known as a word hyperbolic group or Gromov hyperbolic group, is a finitely generated group equipped with a word metric satisfying certain properties abstracted from classical hyperbolic geometry. The notion of a hyperbolic group was introduced and developed by Gromov (1987). The inspiration came from various existing mathematical theories: hyperbolic geometry but also low-dimensional topology (in particular the results of Max Dehn concerning the fundamental group of a hyperbolic Riemann surface, and more complex phenomena in three-dimensional topology), and combinatorial group theory. In a very influential (over 1000 citations ) paper from 1987, Gromov proposed a wide-ranging research program. Ideas and foundational material in the theory of hyperbolic groups also stem from the work of George Mostow, William Thurston, James W. Cannon, Eliyahu Rips, and many others.
Let be a finitely generated group, and be its Cayley graph with respect to some finite set of generators. The set is endowed with its graph metric (in which edges are of length one and the distance between two vertices is the minimal number of edges in a path connecting them) which turns it into a length space. The group is then said to be hyperbolic if is a hyperbolic space in the sense of Gromov. Shortly, this means that there exists a such that any triangle in is -thin, as illustrated in the figure on the right (the space is then said to be -hyperbolic).
A priori this definition depends on the choice of a finite generating set . That this is not the case follows from the two following facts:
- the Cayley graphs respective to two finite generating sets are always quasi-isometric one to the other;
- any geodesic space which is quasi-isometric to a geodesic Gromov-hyperbolic space is itself Gromov-hyperbolic.
Thus we can legitimately speak of a finitely generated group being hyperbolic without referring to a generating set. On the other hand, a space which is quasi-isometric to a -hyperbolic space is itself -hyperbolic for some but the latter depends on both the original and on the quasi-isometry, thus it does not make sense to speak of being -hyperbolic.
The Svarc--Milnor lemma states that if a group acting properly discontinuously and with compact quotient (such an action is often called geometric) on a proper length space then it is finitely generated, and any Cayley graph for is quasi-isometric to . Thus a group is (finitely generated and) hyperbolic if and only if it has a geometric action on a proper hyperbolic space.
If is a subgroup with finite index (i.e. the set is finite) then the inclusion induces a quasi-isometry on the vertices of any (locally finite) Cayley graph of into any (ditto) Cayley graph of . Thus is hyperbolic if and only if itself is. More generally if two groups are commensurable then one is hyperbolic if and only if the other is.
Elementary hyperbolic groups
The simplest examples of hyperbolic groups are finite groups (whose Cayley graphs are of finite diameter hence -hyperbolic with equal to this diameter).
Another very simple example is given by infinite cyclic group (with the generating set triangles are line segments, hence the Cayley graph is -hyperbolic). It follows also that any group which is virtually cyclic (contains a copy of of finite index) is also hyperbolic, for example the infinite dihedral group.
Members in this class of groups are often called elementary hyperbolic groups (the terminology is adapted from that of actions on the hyperbolic plane).
Free groups and groups acting on trees
Let be a finite set and be the free group with generating set . Then the Cayley graph of with respect to is a locally finite Tree (graph theory) and hence a 0-hyperbolic space. Thus is an hyperbolic group.
More generally we see that any group which acts properly discontinuously on a locally finite tree (in this context this means exactly that the stabilizers in of the vertices are finite) is hyperbolic. Indeed, this follows from the fact that has an invariant subtree on which it acts with compact quotient, and the Svarc—Milnor lemma. Such groups are in fact virtually free (i.e. contain a finitely generated free subgroup of finite index), which gives another proof of their hyperbolicity.
An interesting example is the modular group: it acts on the tree given by the 1-skeleton of the associated tessellation of the hyperbolic plane and it has a finite index free subgroup (on two generators) of index 6 (for example the set of matrices in which reduce to the identity modulo 2 is such a group). Note an interesting feature of this example: it acts properly discontinuously on a hyperbolic space (the hyperbolic plane) but the action is not cocompact (and indeed is not quasi-isometric to the hyperbolic plane).
Main article: Fuchsian group
Generalising the example of the modular group a Fuchsian group is a group admitting a properly discontinuous action on the hyperbolic plane (equivalently, a discrete subgroup of ). The hyperbolic plane is a -hyperbolic space and hence the Svarc—Milnor lemma tells us that cocompact Fuchsian groups are hyperbolic.
Examples of such are the fundamental groups of closed surfaces of negative Euler characteristic. Indeed, these surfaces can be obtained as quotients of the hyperbolic plane, as implied by the Poincaré—Koebe Uniformisation theorem.
Another family of examples of cocompact Fuchsian groups is given by triangle groups: all but finitely many are hyperbolic.
Generalising the example of closed surfaces, the fundamental groups of compact Riemannian manifolds with strictly negative sectional curvature are hyperbolic. For example, cocompact lattices in the orthogonal or unitary group of a form of signature are hyperbolic.
A further generalisation is given by groups admitting a geometric action on a CAT(k) space. There exists examples which are not commensurable to any of the previous constructions (for instance groups acting geometrically on hyperbolic buildings).
Small cancellation groups
Main article: Small cancellation theory
Groups having presentations which satisfy small cancellation conditions are hyperbolic. This gives a source of examples which do not have a geometric origin as the ones given above. In fact one of the motivations for the initial development of hyperbolic groups was to give a more geometric interpretation of small cancellation.
Main article: Random group
In some sense, "most" finitely presented groups with large defining relations are hyperbolic. For a quantitative statement of what this means see Random group.
- Non-elementary (infinite and not virtually cyclic) hyperbolic groups have always exponential growth rate (this is a consequence of the Tits alternative).
- Hyperbolic groups satisfy a linear isoperimetric inequality. In fact this is a characterisation of hyperbolicity.
- Hyperbolic groups are always finitely presented. In fact one can explicitly construct a complex (the Rips complex) which is contractible and on which the group acts geometrically. When the group is torsion-free the action is free, showing that the group has finite cohomological dimension.
- In 2002, I. Mineyev showed that hyperbolic groups are exactly those finitely generated groups for which the comparison map between the bounded cohomology and ordinary cohomology is surjective in all degrees, or equivalently, in degree 2.
- Hyperbolic groups have a solvable word problem. They are biautomatic and automatic. Indeed, they are strongly geodesically automatic, that is, there is an automatic structure on the group, where the language accepted by the word acceptor is the set of all geodesic words.
- It was shown in 2010 that hyperbolic groups have a decidable marked isomorphism problem. It is notable that this means that the isomorphism problem, orbit problems (in particular the conjugacy problem) and Whitehead's problem are all decidable.
- Cannon and Swenson have shown that hyperbolic groups with a 2-sphere at infinity have a natural subdivision rule. This is related to Cannon's conjecture.
Relatively hyperbolic groups
Main article: Relatively hyperbolic group
Relatively hyperbolic groups are a class generalising hyperbolic groups. Very roughly is hyperbolic relative to a collection of subgroups if it admits a (not necessarily cocompact) properly discontinuous action on a proper hyperbolic space which is "nice" on the boundary of and such that the stabilisers in of points on the boundary are subgroups in . This is interesting when both and the action of on are not elementary (in particular is infinite: for example every group is hyperbolic relatively to itself via its action on a single point!).
Interesting examples in this class include in particular non-uniform lattices in rank 1 semisimple Lie groups, for example fundamental groups of non-compact hyperbolic manifolds of finite volume. Non-examples are lattices in higher-rank Lie groups and mapping class groups.
Acylindrically hyperbolic groups
An even more general notion is that of an acylindically hyperbolic group. Acylindricity of an action of a group on a metric space is a weakening of proper discontinuity of the action.
A group is said to be acylindrically hyperbolic if it admits a non-elementary acylindrical action on a (not necessarily proper) Gromov-hyperbolic space. This notion includes mapping class groups via their actions on curve complexes. Lattices in higher-rank Lie groups are (still!) not acylindrically hyperbolic.
In another direction one can weaken the assumption about curvature in the examples above: a CAT(0) group is a group admitting a geometric action on a CAT(0) space. This includes Euclidean crystallographic groups and uniform lattices in higher-rank Lie groups.
It is not known whether there exists a hyperbolic group which is not CAT(0).
Essays in Group Theory contains five papers on topics of current interest which were presented in a seminar at MSRI, Berkeley in June, 1985. Special mention should be given to Gromov`s paper, one of the most significant in the field in the last decade. It develops the theory of hyperbolic groups to include a version of small cancellation theory sufficiently powerful to recover deep results of Ol'shanskii and Rips. Each of the remaining papers, by Baumslag and Shalen, Gersten, Shalen, and Stallings contains gems. For example, the reader will delight in Stallings' explicit construction of free actions of orientable surface groups on R-trees. Gersten's paper lays the foundations for a theory of equations over groups and contains a very quick solution to conjugacy problem for a class of hyperbolic groups. Shalen's article reviews the rapidly expanding theory of group actions on R-trees and the Baumslag-Shalen article uses modular representation theory to establish properties of presentations whose relators are pth-powers.